The Influence of St. Francis'  

Literary Works on Ecclesiastical and Secular Ideology

 

by

 

Prof. Carl Edwin Lindgren

 

Member, Royal Historical Society ( London )  and Fellowship of Catholic Scholars

 

Religious and secular history, seems to allude to a direct lineage from St. Francis' writings to the spiritual development and amelioration of the Christian Church. This article will provide some insight into this alleged formation, development, and expansion of Franciscan thought and its affect on certain aspects of Ecclesiastical and Secular Ideology.

 

Introduction

 

Much, has been written regarding the life of John Bernardone, i.e. Saint Francis of Assisi. His lifetime, according to religious historians was one of piety, self-imposed poverty, austerity and spotless purity. His zeal for Church restoration[1] and penance, which eventually led to the formation of the Preachers of Penance, led the inspired preacher of Assisi to produce an assortment of simplistic, beautiful and inspiring literary works. It is, however, impossible to ascribe an exact date to most of these achievements. There is also some question as to whether St. Francis actually penned all the works that were credited to him. Some of these writings may also have been dictated to several individuals who served as his secretaries (Cunningham 1976, 13).

Although possessing only a rudimentary education, St. Francis' writing include examples of Latin, dialectical Italian and French. Although showing a knowledge of the Scriptures and popular proverbs, Cunningham (1976, 14) expresses the opinion that "it is not possible to detect much literary and/or theological influences in his writings".

 

Bernardone's and Lady Poverty

 

Bernardone was born in 1182 at Assisi to Pietro (Peter), a cloth merchant, and his faithful and religious wife Madonna Pica. John, as a child, studies Latin, arithmetic and other academic subjects. This training was to prepare him to follow in his father's footsteps as a cloth merchant. Early in his education, St. Francis probably showed an interest and ability in this field. He was outgoing, and from most accounts enjoyed the luxuries and youthful pursuits of the period. This careless revel was generally encouraged by his father. His father saw in his son a future heir to the family business and who, within limits, should be allowed to relish the gifts of youth. Pietro, attempted to instill in his son the near sanctity of wealth and power which was to be enjoyed and never frittered away on the less fortunate, sick or the lazy.

As with many youth of his time, Francis longed for more. He questioned and searched, yet the answers were not forthcoming. On many occasions, he would enter into fits of emotional turmoil and disparity. Seeing the inequality of the advantaged and impoverished would at times greatly trouble Bernardone. In these moments, he would probably daydream, as he envisioned himself as a member of a great Christian crusade, a gallant knight rescuing a fair lady, or perhaps leading some military glory in a far land. These daydreams and indulgences finally led to his participation in an unsuccessful military campaign against Perugia (a neighboring city) and imprisonment. This year of imprisonment gave Francis time to ponder his future and perhaps evaluate his present life. What surprises many of Francis' imprisoned friends was his high spirits and compassion to fellow inmates. He also showed a surprisingly courteous behavior to his guards. Returning home, Francis was now twenty-one and a new life was slowly emerging.

Almost immediately upon his return, Francis fell ill. The illness was probably typhoid  but upon recovering, his thoughts once again turned to military conquest, excitement and gaiety. He could hardly wait to once again resume his carefree life. Although not the promiscuous man which many paints his early life, Francis simply wished to enjoy his life in a carefree and at times thoughtless manner.  

These early years, however, continued to disillusion and baffle the future St. Francis. It soon, however, became apparent that this battle or holy quest which Bernardone yearned for must be one not of the mundane but rather to be fought on a loftier spiritual plain. Through a series of personal revelations, Francis gained insight into the role and path of a higher chivalry, that being divine intercession to the spiritual poor in Christ's name. Further, Francis became divinely preoccupied by "the defense of her whom Christ himself had espoused; the love of Lady Poverty" (Petry 1941:19). According to Francis, "To die for love is a great adventure. To live for love is a far greater adventure, and that means bringing love to meet love every day in the common things of life" (Mackay 1930, 15).

Becoming, according to his friends, more and more eccentric, Francis became dedicated to rebuilding Christ's church, disposing of his worldly goods and finally surrendering body and will to travel forward to preach peace, brotherly love, repentance and the coming kingdom (Petry 1941:21;  Celano). Unlike other 'reformists' of the period, Francis did not criticize the existing church 's concept of poverty but rather stressed that "humble co-operation with the church, whatever its failings, could insure total and redemptive poverty" (Petry 1941:25). To St. Francis, to strive toward Christ's renunciative state (ascetic self-denial) one must be willing not only to denounce the world's tangible goods (physical poverty)[2] but also a spiritual surrendering; one which is all-inclusive. This embraced not only a relinquishing of wealth and worldly possessions but also denouncement of self (ego or I). This complete denial is evident in the words of the Master –

 

Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me (Matthew 16:24).

 

And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me ( Mark 8:34). 

 

Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me (Mark 10:21). 

 

Francis, in his quest for spiritual as well as physical poverty realized "that it was infinitely easier to surrender property and to crucify the flesh than it was to conquer the spirit" (Petry 1941, 27). It was also hoped that this physical surrendering of money, possessions and position would also serve to bring a state of external peace. Perhaps the final quest was an all encompassing, sustaining internal and external peace.

Further, St. Francis emphasized the importance of a co-operative spirit between the Brothers and Sisters of Penitence. This was especially evident in his Laud of the Virtures in that the unity or oneness of the poor in Christ creates strength and the virtues of humility, obedience, love[3] and simplicity overthrows pride, lust, desire and avarice. 

 

Knowledge and Poverty

 

St. Francis, was not totally against the concept of learning and gaining knowledge. He knew, however, that such a path could lead to envy, pride and spite. Therefore, learning was not to be considered as an evil vice, rather the potential effects of such an endeavor. Learning and the quest for knowledge also had the potential of leading one away from the path of poverty. With learning came the purchase of books, places to store the books and documents, time spent away from prayer and  the potential abandonment of the simplicity and detachment of the mundane and worldly (Petry 1941, 30).  Further, Francis felt that learning could lead to a straying from humility toward arrogance. In his philosophy of renouncement, Francis states -

Dixit aliquando magnum clericum etiam scientiae quodammodo resignare debere, cum veniret ad Ordinem, ut tali expropriatus possessione, nudum se offerret brachiis Crucifixi (note. II Celano).

The concept of prideful learning, wealth, isolation and near indifference was evident by many of the then existing Church monasteries. Over the years, these cloisters of Christian solace had hardened their hearts and minds toward the common man. Living behind high walls of stone and indifference, the monastic orders had lost the love and compassion which Christ had taught. To Francis, to be saved, truly saved, is achieved through the act of saving other, of preaching love to others and finally of  cheerfully associating with the poor, lost, sick and helpless. An association which he felt would console, enlighten and convert (Sabatier 1928, xx). This act of selflessness, of spiritual giving was different from that which had existed in recent years within the Holy Church. Far too often, the clergy had fixed a price to their charity and love. During the Crusades the popes had preached the Cross, encouraging knights, nobles and poor alike to liberate the Holy Land. In return these soldiers of Christ were promised remission of sins and salvation. St. Peter Chrysologus like so many others  prior to Francis had preached a selfish love, stating "Give to the poor that you may give to yourself; give him a crumb in order to receive a loaf; give him a shelter to receive heaven" (Sabatier 1928, xx). Francis felt that man should provide a selfless love to his fellowman. A love based on Christ's teaching and the grace of Lady Poverty. This was a path which he felt that God had selected for him and his followers.

Regarding, the issue of scripture reading there is some conflict since at times writers on Francis allude that he emphasized that by living the path a disciple becomes one with the word of God and Scripture reading was not of a paramount importance. However, it is well known that Francis, was an avid reader of God's word and was inspired through his reading, studying, and quoting to formulate certain of his 'rules of life'. In clarifying this statement, it is best to quote from Celano (II): Frater, tantam dulcedinem et consolationem invenio cotidie, in mea memoria ex meditatione humilitatis vestigiorum Filii Dei, quod si usque in finem seculi viverem, non multum necesse esset mihi alias scripturas audire vel meditari.

Francis, did not attempt to analyze Biblical Scriptures but rather accepted them as the literal word of God through his Son, Christ Jesus and his anointed. By accepting the Bible unquestioningly, through humility rather than a search for worldly knowledge, he felt that each word was divinely implanted into his soul and spirit.

 

Humility and Discipline

 

The greeting "The Lord give you peace," were the by-words of St. Francis and his band of poor brothers (or les jongleurs de Dieu) . Humility, compassion, love and understanding were shared between each brother and from each brother to mankind. This is not to say, however, that the First Order of St. Francis was without discipline. In fact, discipline played a paramount role in guiding and forming a brother (disciple). It, as Petry (1941, 140) states, was a necessity. Although the friars knew the importance of strict discipline, they also realized the importance of forgiveness and the folly of self-righteous judging. Far too often they has been reminded by Francis of the Biblical scriptures pertaining to judging: "Judge not, that ye be not judged"( Matthew 7:1). and  Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven ..." (Luke 6:37). They knew the condemnation they would receive from St. Francis and later from their Heavenly Father in Christ Jesus.

 

Francis and the Rule of Life

 

Originally, the Order of Penance, was not conceived as a separate Order but rather a way of life consistent with changing values, toward a renouncing of all to follow the Master. During this initial period, the only rule, other than the Bible, "was the Letter to all Christians written in 1213 or 1215, of which the theme is the extension of the Kingdom of God, a call to all men to live by the Gospel, [and] a passionate exhortation to perfection" (De Robeck 1930, 12). St. Francis' outpouring of love and Christian enthusiasm touched the lives of a diversed and inspired humanity. Thousands among the laity joined with the movement.

The Rule of the Third Order was written in 1221 (added to in 1228). Although written in part by Cardinal Ugolini[4] (Boehmer 1904) the Rule also showed the inspiration of St. Francis. With this simple document, the Order was able to endure the hardships and repressions which they were to undergo. Through this Rule and the inspiration of St. Francis, the Order became a model for many future associations as well as for a period eclipsing most of the other lay fraternities (De Robeck 1930, 18). The Blessed Angela of Foligno, a Franciscan Tertiary articulated St. Francis' spirit through the phrase, "The whole world is full of God."  Further one is also aware of St. Francis' influence in the statement that "'every vision, every revelation, every sweetness, all sentiment, knowledge, elevation, and contemplation is useless if man has not the knowledge of God and of himself'" (De Robeck 1930, 40). The Blessed Ramon Lull, "defined sin as the 'turning and directing of the intention away from the final Cause and Intention for which all things have been created by my Beloved '"(De Robeck 1930, 131).

 

Conclusion

 

Petry (1941, 169) states that "He [Francis] must be credited with having contributed to man's vague uneasiness with artificial attractions that threaten to lure his from life's realities . . . Somehow he knew that the more one gets, the less satisfaction there is to be had outside of getting." "There is a strong call today, then, for the strong and happy to come to the rescue of the weak and unhappy. Before they can do this they must know what weakness and unhappiness are themselves" (Mackay 1930, 96). Although it is true that without Ugolino's practical and theological assistance, the Order would not have been the driving force within the Church, which it later because, it is equally true that without Francis's unchanging and steadfastness Franciscanism could have never existed nor its divine mystic air continue to guide the chosen few to the Lady of Poverty (De La Bedoyere 1964, 214).Chesterton (1924, 230) stated that Francis was a great giver, giving that which was best of a giver, thanksgiving. "He was the soul of mediæval civilization before it ever found a body" (232-33).  As Green (1985) states, "He was and still remains the man who transcends our sad theological barriers. He belongs to everyone, like the love that is unceasingly offered to us. You couldn't see him without loving him, they said in his day; and that love has stayed the course."                      

 


[1] Unlike reformers prior to or after  Francis, St. Francis was not interested in changing the Church. In fact he would not allow the least departure of its fundamental principles.  Francis, considered the Church to be and always remain  Christ's spouse. Francis could be considered to be an obedient and faithful Catholic to the last. His preaching of poverty, penance and love never conflicted with Church doctrine. Therefore, his Church restoration was merely the spiritual and physical strengthening of the true Christian faith." Francis believed that no true poverty could flourish where obedience to the church was not manifested" (Petry 1941, 109).

[2] Consisting of simplicity in dress, refraining from dubious distractions and an abandonment of physical aspirations.

[3] It should be understood that this spiritual and physical love was a kinetic agape based not on words but actions. This love was extended to  the poor, rich, leper, enemy and the varied animal and plant kingdoms. Francis was keenly attuned to the pain and suffering of animals. Referring to many of God's small creatures as brothers, Francis had a special tenderness for lambs and doves. Both of which, he believed symbolized God love for mankind.

[4] Sometimes spelt Ugolino, the Cardinal, according to la Bedoyere (1964, 164) "was a man of the deepest personal piety with a serious desire for the reform of the Church and its adaptation to the conditions of the times." Also note Mackay, 1930, 56.

References:

Boehmer, H. 1904.  Analekten zur Geschichte des Franciscus von Assisi. S. Francisci opuscula, regula paenitentium, antiquissima de regula Minorum ... Tubingen and Leipzig:Mohr.

 

Chesterton, Gilbert K. 1924. St. Francis of Assisi. NY:George H. Doran Co.

 

De La Bedoyere, Michael. 1964. Francis: A Biography of the Saint of Assisi. Garden City, NY: Image Books.

 

De Robeck, Nesta. 1930. Among the Franciscan Tertiaries. London & Toronto: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.

 

Green, Julien. 1985. God's Fool: The Life and Times of Francis of Assisi. Translated by Peter Heinegg. San Francisco: Harper & Row, Publishers.

 

Mackay, H. F. B. 1930. The Message of Francis of Assisi. Milwaukee: Morehouse Publishing Co.

 

Petry, Ray C. 1941. Francis of Assisi: Apostle of Poverty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

 

Sabatier, Paul. 1928. Life of St. Francis of Assisi. NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.

 

Thomas of Celano. (ca. 1228-1229 and 1244-1247) First and Second Lives of Francis as found in P. Edouard Alençon. 1906. S. Francisci Assisensis Vita et Miracula Additis Opusculis Liturgicis Auctore Fr. Thoma de Celano. Rome.